Every Summer, the peacocks that roam free within Whipsnade Park expose their magnificent trains to the critical gaze of the peahens. They re-enact the mystery that tormented Charles Darwin: how in this competitive world could birds have evolved such an obvious extravagance? Marion petrie and her colleagues are now trying to settle the matter. Darwin advanced the idea of evolution through natural section, i.e., the 'fittest' are likely to survive. The peacock's tail, by contrast, was at best a waste of space and a severe encumbrance that he felt obliged to refer as 'beauty for beauty's sake'. Russel Wallace was even more Darwinian. If peahens chose peacocks with the showiest trains, then it must be that they knew what they were about. The cocks must have some other quality, not necessarily obvious. The train was not an end in itself, but an advertisement for some genuine contribution to survival.
Now, 100 Years later, the wrangle is still unresolved. But 200 birds at Whipsnade offer unique opportunities for study. Marion petrie's team has identified two questions. Frist, do peahens really choose the males with the showiest trains? And, secondly, do the peacocks with the showiest trains have some extra, genuinely advantageous quality? Long observation from hides, backed up by photographs, suggests that the cocks with the most eye-spots do indeed attract the most mates. Showy male birds in general are the most parasite-free and advertise their disease- free state. But Petrie and her colleagues have not been able to assess the internal parasites in the Whipsnade peacocks. This year, however, she is comparing the offspring of cocks that have in the past proved attractive to hens with the offspring of cocks that hens find unattractive. R A Fisher's suggestion in the nineteen-thirties has become known as the 'Fisher's Runway'. This occurs when a female first picks a male with a slightly better tail than the rest. The sons of that mating will inherit their father's tail and the daughters will inherit their mother's predilection for long tails. This is how the runway begins. Within each generation. the males with the longest tails will get most mates and leave most offspring; and the females' predilection for long tails will increase commensurately.
What does 'Fisher's' Runaway' suggest ?
What does 'Fisher's' Runaway' suggest ?
-
ক
that inherited characteristics gradually become stronger
-
খ
that peacocks are exceptions to general biological laws
-
গ
that peahens react instinctively to beauty
-
ঘ
that Darwin underestimated the intelligence of animals
Related Question
View All-
ক
Understanding one's priorities in life is important in order to succeed
-
খ
To utilise own potential everyone needs to control the distractions and manage their attention
-
গ
Maximising focus is all about recognising when one's attention is being stolen
-
ঘ
Attention management requires stringent practice and constant effort
-
ক
It is an attempt to discourage curiosity
-
খ
It points to a lack of self-confidence
-
গ
It conceals the true nature of her personality
-
ঘ
It comes as a surprise to her readers
-
ক
She prefers books with lots of action
-
খ
She is less keen on male than female writers
-
গ
She believes that men write better books than women
-
ঘ
She thinks that women writers are not given enough credit
-
ক
support
-
খ
commitment
-
গ
confidence
-
ঘ
opportunity
-
ক
It was well suited to her talents
-
খ
It was not a satisfying experience
-
গ
It was useful for her future writing
-
ঘ
It was not sufficiently demanding
-
ক
It was not necessary to pay attention to establish patterns
-
খ
The conventions did not adversely affect the quality of her writing
-
গ
It was inevitable that she would become emotionally involved
-
ঘ
The subject matter was more limiting than she had expected
১ ক্লিকে প্রশ্ন, শীট, সাজেশন ও
অনলাইন পরীক্ষা তৈরির সফটওয়্যার!
শুধু প্রশ্ন সিলেক্ট করুন — প্রশ্নপত্র অটোমেটিক তৈরি!
Related Question
Question Analytics
মোট উত্তরদাতা
জন